How do static and kinematic surveying differ?

The distinction between static and kinematic surveying primarily lies in the method of data collection. In static surveying, measurements are taken at fixed positions with the equipment remaining stationary for a certain period. This method allows for very precise determination of coordinates by observing satellite signals over a longer time, which reduces the impact of atmospheric disturbances and other errors.

In contrast, kinematic surveying involves collecting data while the observer or the equipment is in motion, often utilizing a GPS receiver that continuously computes its position as it moves. This approach is particularly useful for surveying larger areas quickly and can capture real-time data as the equipment traverses the landscape.

The other potential answers touch on aspects that may vary, such as resource requirements and accuracy, but these do not encapsulate the fundamental operational difference between the two methods. Static surveying's focus on fixed points and prolonged observation time versus kinematic surveying's technique of collecting data on the move is what sets them apart clearly.